Information on Result #473964

There is no (94, 220, 192)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 701024 054669 856933 221350 456075 388497 105577 160100 086026 813584 054875 > 2220

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (94, 221, 192)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction