Information on Result #473966
There is no (98, 220, 208)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 961731 522954 282802 812189 606242 232595 176816 697277 484381 544110 142308 > 2220
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (98, 221, 208)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |