Information on Result #473981

There is no (128, 220, 431)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 699147 682601 322037 384920 403710 679576 758285 872993 084908 775239 074209 > 2220

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (128, 221, 431)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction