Information on Result #473990

There is no (146, 220, 850)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 701758 422369 395555 963256 565012 798086 935867 884204 930233 507541 812440 > 2220

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (146, 221, 850)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction