Information on Result #473996

There is no (158, 220, 1655)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 707529 212527 764067 551916 608373 630856 823966 883087 877594 826294 394376 > 2220

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (158, 221, 1655)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction