Information on Result #474007

There is no (180, 220, 16978)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 685283 922878 549103 518424 510227 090549 873675 803691 008937 461998 384096 > 2220

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (180, 221, 16978)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction