Information on Result #474033

There is no (93, 221, 188)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 593534 941946 587389 938837 638032 164105 651417 267040 998231 969609 750826 > 2221

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (93, 222, 188)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction