Information on Result #474036

There is no (99, 221, 211)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 774834 953716 599043 261497 650243 251902 869335 079758 081252 173314 445824 > 2221

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (99, 222, 211)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction