Information on Result #474072

There is no (171, 221, 4627)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 372926 411681 175870 837243 032125 400590 895211 410095 608983 507397 467392 > 2221

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (171, 222, 4627)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction