Information on Result #474099

There is no (84, 222, 160)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 010507 192126 262506 942855 470433 647623 482196 976730 971546 788053 216110 > 2222

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (84, 223, 160)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction