Information on Result #474100
There is no (86, 222, 166)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 8 088122 637483 022132 271939 902366 164377 564758 893190 149062 715244 581642 > 2222
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (86, 223, 166)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |