Information on Result #474172
There is no (89, 223, 174)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14 672109 040276 505143 013947 670460 425100 864303 442009 168622 924259 511692 > 2223
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (89, 224, 174)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |