Information on Result #474208

There is no (161, 223, 1773)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13 674208 541617 982498 583608 056197 947235 626623 924283 286010 851046 633168 > 2223

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (161, 224, 1773)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction