Information on Result #474241
There is no (88, 224, 171)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 32 993506 160864 938489 984190 460918 912537 629975 966876 519379 904463 210084 > 2224
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (88, 225, 171)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |