Information on Result #474246

There is no (98, 224, 204)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 28 215715 740591 763967 540501 489203 945608 169373 923884 169398 843709 769328 > 2224

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (98, 225, 204)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction