Information on Result #474261
There is no (128, 224, 410)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 29 748226 344257 195814 594098 729516 923100 510554 665552 023404 737681 888804 > 2224
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (128, 225, 410)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |