Information on Result #474266

There is no (138, 224, 564)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27 955353 141056 418667 359022 664727 940846 790188 092990 504906 523811 383286 > 2224

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (138, 225, 564)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction