Information on Result #474278
There is no (162, 224, 1814)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27 299723 492204 995749 743445 463787 336942 970758 718571 248838 036644 806400 > 2224
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (162, 225, 1814)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |