Information on Result #474283

There is no (172, 224, 4100)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27 030450 327419 847342 169592 463107 057361 069984 368703 895983 395002 570240 > 2224

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (172, 225, 4100)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction