Information on Result #474311

There is no (85, 225, 162)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 61 690060 588493 105656 872027 919513 530990 107610 143603 157197 061008 483872 > 2225

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (85, 226, 162)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction