Information on Result #474312

There is no (87, 225, 168)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 71 462505 351756 822828 517623 132983 626423 467144 820501 918832 543550 988726 > 2225

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (87, 226, 168)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction