Information on Result #474313

There is no (89, 225, 173)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 57 393042 181356 887048 337972 014736 132765 954718 720035 851452 761108 068334 > 2225

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 226, 173)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction