Information on Result #474313
There is no (89, 225, 173)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 57 393042 181356 887048 337972 014736 132765 954718 720035 851452 761108 068334 > 2225
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (89, 226, 173)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |