Information on Result #474315

There is no (93, 225, 186)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 65 059233 827527 806378 655701 117690 173232 907066 227484 252871 806480 940328 > 2225

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (93, 226, 186)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction