Information on Result #474349
There is no (161, 225, 1627)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 54 841338 530563 219862 221763 401319 503879 026271 207057 449125 343996 692522 > 2225
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (161, 226, 1627)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |