Information on Result #474351

There is no (165, 225, 2137)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 54 518175 275212 676765 056944 197101 277448 061641 082269 113746 267282 812768 > 2225

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 226, 2137)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction