Information on Result #474384

There is no (90, 226, 176)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 130 484504 267510 788047 556325 141890 794283 113200 809348 472362 129559 424282 > 2226

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (90, 227, 176)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction