Information on Result #474387

There is no (96, 226, 195)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 110 852094 891321 757378 248658 850976 524792 777328 064942 317942 567554 744764 > 2226

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 227, 195)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction