Information on Result #474387
There is no (96, 226, 195)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 110 852094 891321 757378 248658 850976 524792 777328 064942 317942 567554 744764 > 2226
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (96, 227, 195)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |