Information on Result #474403

There is no (128, 226, 400)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 116 677308 112093 916509 891673 383365 577823 754875 630216 488666 133156 628552 > 2226

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (128, 227, 400)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction