Information on Result #474492

There is no (161, 227, 1501)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 216 674756 934900 236392 430170 162703 125077 539764 207856 234691 148575 437652 > 2227

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (161, 228, 1501)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction