Information on Result #474514

There is no (205, 227, 8001617)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 215 679661 538646 410348 417963 574006 692754 341892 443134 335027 166463 701552 > 2227

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (205, 228, 8001617)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction