Information on Result #474550

There is no (134, 228, 465)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 466 755335 532160 074422 863121 571224 937437 259988 975880 988274 844473 753600 > 2228

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (134, 229, 465)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction