Information on Result #474555

There is no (144, 228, 652)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 456 174216 220515 117470 536814 975512 882677 673808 604992 728424 921541 625172 > 2228

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (144, 229, 652)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction