Information on Result #474571

There is no (176, 228, 4566)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 433 277356 718312 447375 968281 728985 560190 156794 636687 799866 901457 739248 > 2228

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (176, 229, 4566)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction