Information on Result #474572

There is no (178, 228, 5626)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 431 824460 383908 424816 032226 694375 074337 698303 277416 215799 856718 207157 > 2228

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (178, 229, 5626)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction