Information on Result #474599

There is no (87, 229, 166)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 979 547175 297728 475456 248913 464695 877638 521499 926526 562858 339875 573432 > 2229

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (87, 230, 166)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction