Information on Result #474600
There is no (89, 229, 172)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1114 610451 988480 454951 120717 392967 378094 181236 325284 830098 423520 132748 > 2229
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (89, 230, 172)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |