Information on Result #474602

There is no (93, 229, 184)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1107 923329 000072 404101 111136 625699 123449 459061 423158 343413 929984 193990 > 2229

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (93, 230, 184)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction