Information on Result #474622

There is no (133, 229, 445)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 915 051003 051490 987586 039632 580522 439478 505607 122478 506882 366607 582003 > 2229

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (133, 230, 445)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction