Information on Result #474632

There is no (153, 229, 925)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 889 153684 660285 295378 685635 718164 587387 766744 412468 305894 848294 760928 > 2229

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (153, 230, 925)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction