Information on Result #474636
There is no (161, 229, 1393)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 874 737542 710071 052594 669281 836810 276079 328345 394482 598971 252253 899420 > 2229
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (161, 230, 1393)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |