Information on Result #474638

There is no (165, 229, 1778)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 870 555840 688036 802404 012230 408625 986416 911800 193772 325784 252839 067773 > 2229

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 230, 1778)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction