Information on Result #474678

There is no (102, 230, 215)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1987 360233 016486 710134 390827 044902 186645 361366 873559 192569 736737 819027 > 2230

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (102, 231, 215)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction