Information on Result #474709
There is no (164, 230, 1602)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1742 910171 972451 076656 163334 894479 008412 949720 476238 704423 928676 723330 > 2230
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (164, 231, 1602)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |