Information on Result #474727

There is no (200, 230, 265170)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1725 466962 391257 212658 369174 941671 519117 168897 011549 882178 478809 919528 > 2230

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (200, 231, 265170)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction