Information on Result #474744

There is no (91, 231, 177)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 4517 512564 171995 127093 939858 021893 699275 548091 435825 969405 345617 294608 > 2231

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (91, 232, 177)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction