Information on Result #474779
There is no (161, 231, 1299)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3536 653875 442334 822749 636118 662138 846196 804331 380865 469712 127455 392688 > 2231
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (161, 232, 1299)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |