Information on Result #474819

There is no (96, 232, 192)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 8767 669901 744300 355046 899190 804746 135869 344651 656789 022244 048446 736810 > 2232

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 233, 192)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction