Information on Result #474820

There is no (98, 232, 198)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7164 840271 376388 261698 127765 184727 888506 686417 283125 556161 517496 182774 > 2232

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (98, 233, 198)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction