Information on Result #474852

There is no (162, 232, 1326)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7075 652075 770297 801101 585784 582493 611947 101615 803001 268894 619419 118590 > 2232

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (162, 233, 1326)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction