Information on Result #474853

There is no (164, 232, 1484)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7006 624132 180736 161749 325777 166389 215368 912516 411002 787621 110175 730366 > 2232

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (164, 233, 1484)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction